ACTRIMS FORUM 2026 HIGHLIGHTS – MONDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2026

 

Tuesday Edition

The following summarizes some of the highlights from the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in MS (ACTRIMS) Forum, held February 5-7, 2026 in San Diego, California.

Fenebrutinib vs. ocrelizumab in PPMS
Effect of higher-efficacy DMTs on PIRMA risk
Switching from ocrelizumab to ofatumumab
Vitamin B a useful adjunct to S1PR modulators?
Tolebrutinib in nrSPMS: North American results
Epidemiology of NMOSD in Ontario

CONGRESS HIGHLIGHTS – MONDAY EDITION

Fenebrutinib vs. ocrelizumab in PPMS
FENtrepid is a phase III non-inferiority trial comparing fenebrutinib, a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, with ocrelizumab in 985 patients with PPMS for ≥120 weeks (Bar-Or et al. ACTRIMS Forum 2026;LB1.5). The primary endpoint was time to onset of 12-week confirmed disability progression (CDP) using a composite measure (EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT). Mean age was 48.9 years, median EDSS score was 5.0, and mean time from MS symptom onset was 9 years. A low proportion of patients (10.8%) had Gd+ lesions at baseline. Fenebrutinib 200 mg BID PO was non-inferior to ocrelizumab 600 mg IV q24weeks: there were fewer CDP events with fenebrutinib starting at week 12. The proportion with a CDP event at endpoint was 58.8% with fenebrutinib compared to 66.1% with ocrelizumab (12% risk reduction, ns). The treatment effect was consistent across subgroups, including age, sex, baseline EDSS score, baseline Gd+ lesions and prior DMT use. The rate of serious adverse events was similar with fenebrutinib and ocrelizumab (19.1% vs. 18.9%). Serious infections were less common with fenebrutinib (6.1% vs. 9.1%). The rate of liver-enzyme abnormalities was 13.3% with fenebrutinib and 2.0% with ocrelizumab. Two patients in the fenebrutinib arm (0.4%) and one in the ocrelizumab arm (0.2%) met Hy’s Law biochemical criteria; the impact of drug was uncertain since there were alternative etiologies. A total of 14.1% in the fenebrutinib arm discontinued treatment due to liver enzyme elevations as mandated in the study protocol. There were seven deaths during fenebrutinib treatment; all were considered to be unrelated to the study drug. Phase II results from the FENopta trial of RMS were published last year (Bar-Or et al. Lancet Neurol 2025;24:656-666). Two phase III trials in RMS (FENhance 1 and 2) are ongoing.

(See also BTK inhibitors – a look ahead, NeuroSens, January 26, 2026.)

Effect of higher-efficacy DMTs on PIRMA risk
A retrospective observational study examined the rate of progression independent of relapse or MRI activity (PIRMA) in RRMS patients receiving higher-efficacy (MAbs, cladribine) or lower-efficacy (all other therapies) DMTs (Guarnaschelli et al. ACTRIMS Forum 2026;P421). Median age of onset was 31 years; median duration of MS was 7-9 years. According to the interim analysis (n=176), treatment with a moderate- or low-efficacy DMT was associated with a higher risk of PIRMA (hazard ratio 7.05). At the time of the analysis, 43% of patients in the moderate-efficacy group and 74% in the low-efficacy group had switched treatments.

Switching from ocrelizumab to ofatumumab
The OLIKOS phase IIIb study evaluated the efficacy and safety of switching from an infusion anti-CD20 agent to ofatumumab administered by subcutaneous injection in 102 RMS patients (Hua et al. J Neurol 2025;272:725). One patient switched from rituximab; the remainder switched from ocrelizumab. At the time of switching, the mean CD19+ B cell concentration was 25.8 cells/μL; 6.9% had B cell counts within the normal range (mean 7.8 months after last infusion). B cell counts declined to 2.3 cells/μL at 12 months after initiating ofatumumab (Hua et al. ACTRIMS Forum 2026;P055). After changing therapies, B cell counts were reduced to below the lower limit of normal at months 6 and 12 in all patients including those with B cell repletion while on IV anti-CD20 therapy. The authors suggested that monthly dosing may produce a more consistent and sustained effect on B cell concentrations compared to less frequent dosing.

Vitamin B a useful adjunct to S1PR modulators?
S1P receptor modulators (e.g. fingolimod, ozanimod, siponimod) target sphingosine-1-phosphate, a signalling molecule that regulates immune cell trafficking. Treatment blocks lymphocyte egress from lymphoid organs, thereby reducing the passage of immune cells across the blood-brain barrier. Vitamin B6 (pyroxidal 5′-phosphate) is a necessary cofactor for S1P lyase, an enzyme that degrades S1P. A metabolomic study examined the effects of vitamin B6 and B-complex supplementation in 73 early MS patients (Liu et al. ACTRIMS Forum 2026;P022). Mean age was 39 years. Vitamin B supplementation was associated with lower levels of S1P and dihydro-S1P (a saturated analogue of S1P). The authors suggested that vitamin B supplements may modulate S1P metabolism in MS and could be a useful adjunct to S1PR modulator therapy.

Tolebrutinib in nrSPMS: North American results
The HERCULES phase III trial compared the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor tolebrutinib 60 mg/day with placebo in 1131 patients with non-relapsing SPMS (Fox et al. N Engl J Med 2025;392:1883-1892). The proportion of patients with 6-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) was significantly lower with tolebrutinib than placebo (22.6% vs. 30.7%, hazard ratio 0.69). A new analysis has reported efficacy results in the subgroup of 162 patients (14.3% of total) at Canadian and U.S. centres (Bar-Or et al. ACTRIMS Forum 2026;P127). North American patients were older (mean age 51.8 vs. 48.9 years), had lower EDSS scores (mean 5.2 vs. 5.5), and were less likely to have Gd+ lesions at baseline (4.4% vs. 12.7%). The estimated incidence of 6-month CDP was 54% lower with tolebrutinib in North American patients (62% lower in Americans, 31% lower for the full cohort). The FDA recently rejected tolebrutinib’s application as a treatment for nrSPMS primarily due to safety concerns. The FDA identified six cases of hepatotoxicity meeting Hy’s Law criteria in the drug development program (FDA complete response, 23 December 2026; full text at https://download.open.fda.gov/crl/CRL_NDA219624_20251223.pdf).

Epidemiology of NMOSD in Ontario
An analysis of health claims and laboratory data in Ontario identified 179 cases of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) in the province; mean age at first attack was 47 years. The estimated mean incidence of AQP4+ NMOSD was 0.105 cases/100,000 population per year for the period 2018-2024 (Rotstein et al. ACTRIMS Forum 2026;P343). The point prevalence for 2024 was 1.222/100,000. Prior studies have reported NMOSD incidence rates ranging from 0.053/100,000 in Cuba to 4.4/100,000 in southern Denmark (Etemadifar et al. Mult Scler Int 2015:2015:174720). Prevalence estimates range from 0.52 in Cuba to 4.41/100,000 in southern Denmark (Etemadifar 2015). It should be noted, however, that prior studies have used different diagnostic criteria (e.g. Mayo Clinic criteria in Cuba, Wingerchuk criteria in Denmark).

Tuesday Edition

Recommend to a Colleague

Related Posts

Go back to home page